Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.
Tampilkan postingan dengan label home builders. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label home builders. Tampilkan semua postingan

Constructing Capitulation: A Look Back at 2007

Rabu, 02 Januari 2008

At the start of 2007, it was pretty clear that something had seriously gone wrong with residential housing markets in the United States.

After nearly a full year of declining home sales, widespread homebuilder and home “investor” trauma and some precursors of the mortgage-credit implosion, the backdrop was clearly set for a larger and more pervasive unveiling of one of history’s greatest economic debacles.

The Fed and chairman Ben Bernanke, though publicly reassuring and confident, promoting themes such as “containment” of the housing “slowdown” and the absence of “spillover” effects on the wider economy, were belatedly introducing new lending regulations sending some troubled lenders, such as New Century Financial and Countrywide Financial, scrambling to either adopt the changes or to sidestep them.

Realtors, on the other hand, presented a decidedly optimistic outlook both pushing a new ad campaign that promoted the false notion that “It’s a Great Time to Buy or Sell a Home” as well as having their then chief economist David Lereah report, through the traditional “dimwitted” and “bought and paid for” “make believe” news media, that the housing market was in the early stages of recovery.

Even some beleaguered yet not altogether beaten homebuilders such as “dancing” Bob Toll seemed to portray a sense of optimism, suggesting that the new home market was seeing some positive signs such as stronger than expected “commitments” in Maryland, Greater Washington DC and even portions of California, cancelations abating and evidence suggesting that consumers were simply sitting on the sidelines ready to buy at the first sign of price stability.

Unfortunately for scores of unlucky home buyers who were influenced by the National Association of Realtors and the other industry insiders onslaught of media propaganda, home purchases made at the start of 2007 had come nearly at the absolute zenith of home values… prices that, after having been artificially inflated by years of an unrestrained speculative frenzy and unchecked lending, will not be seen for many years to come.

Try as they might though, the false euphoria created by the real estate industry would last only moments as the housing collapse proved yet again that it was not going to go away silently.

To start the unwinding anew and with a decidedly ironic twist, New Century Financial, one of the nation’s largest subprime loan originator REITs announced that they needed to restate earnings for the majority of 2006 in order to “correct” improper accounting of an underestimated volume of “repurchase claims”, claims made by investors when loans purchased from the originator default unusually early.

Now, it appeared that all at once, and with the help of a handy dandy daily chronicle, lenders were dropping like flies as a flow of disclosures showed losses mounting quicker than any lending institution had anticipated and, for many, could reasonably manage.

The thick greenish gooey smog of the subprime slime was quickly descending, enveloping not just the nation but the worlds lending, housing and financial markets in a taint so pervasive and infectious that the losses would eventually be tallied in the tens of billions with conservative projections of many hundreds of billions.

Not all real estate industry insiders were so aware of the magnitude or consequence of the subprime debacle turning instead to other factors for explanation of the continued decline in buyer enthusiasm such as David Lereah’s suggestion that “El Nino” was the culprit of lagging sales.

Others though saw the writing on the wall quite clearly and accurately though and were not shy about admitting the extent to which the environment was going to “suck” for the remainder of 2007.

With scores of smaller, more risky, lenders and originators on the ropes and the lending-credit debacle escalating, the initial signs of a clever bluff could be interpreted from the statements of one of the nation’s largest lenders, the yet again even more ironically named Countrywide Financial (NYSE:CFC).

As the unfolding crisis had begun to cast a shadow of doubt over the whole of the real estate industry, many market participants found themselves fielding questions about the extent of its impact on their operations and even Congress began ratcheting up their investigations into the causes and possible outcome as well as debating possible plans for a public “bail out”.

The “second shoe” had dropped.

The budding false optimism from earlier in the year had correctly shriveled as the real estate industry resumed its downward spiral and now the mortgage lending industry, having come apart at the seams, degenerated into an ugly case of blame and finger pointing.

Heading into the summer of 2007 it was clear that there was a “perfect storm” on the horizon.

Try as they might, central bankers could no longer continue to ignore or downplay the significance of the lending meltdown that had now escalated into a wider credit crunch.

The economy that had just appeared “likely to continue expanding at a moderate pace supported by solid growth in employment and incomes” the day before was now experiencing “appreciable downside risks to growth” and requiring “facilitate the orderly functioning of financial markets”.

The cat was out of the bag, the subprime mortgage turmoil had now shown itself to be the tip of a far larger and more cataclysmic iceberg that would have credit markets reeling around the globe as the house of cards had begun to fold bit by bit.

Not even the superb bluffing on the part of “top conditioned athlete” such as Countrywide Financial’s Angelo Mozilo could prevent the outgoing tide of investor sentiment.

A single simple and now likely accurate forecast for possible bankruptcy amid a rising tide of delinquencies and foreclosure sent the nation’s largest lender down for the count as its stock dropped over 80% in value.

Along with it went all hopes that anything other than a complete washout was in store for the nation’s housing markets as the commercial lending markets collapsed and Jumbo loans, one of the major sources of fuel that served to inflate the massive housing bubble, all but disappeared.

Coming into the Fall Ben Bernanke and the Fed, although likely still not fully accepting the depth and enormity of the unwinding, were clearly in crisis mode.

Putting aside any caution of creating “moral hazard”, the Fed slashed the Fed funds rate and continued its other operations in an effort to stave-off widespread panic but at this point it seemed plainly clear that they were behind the curve essentially plugging holes that had sprung far in advance of their attention.

All home sales indicators now began to register resounding confirmation that the massive structural changes that took place during the summer would lead to a new leg down in the housing decline.

The new and existing and more leading pending existing home sales data all showed quite clearly that a significant percentage of buyers had been simply removed from the equation resulting in another 15%-20% falloff in demand for residential real estate.

Home prices too have suffered, showing the most negative and most widely felt declines to home prices ever recorded by the S&P/Case-Shiller home price indices.

As for the consumer, the initial signs now clearly show that the housing collapse has begun to spillover with confidence plunging to recessionary levels, weakening employment situation, real retail sales of discretionary items continuing to remain negative, and a significant pullback in the production of some consumer durables and even a possible collapse of commercial real estate as well.

2007 ended, in a sense, in a similar but altogether more severe state than it had begun.

A famous former president of the National Association of Realtor’s can still not sell his own home even with all the propaganda NAR money can afford, NAR’s predictions are no more accurate, and homebuilder sentiment is borders on depression.


The primary difference is that the ruse is over.

The housing bubble is in obvious collapse in America and elsewhere around the world and the mortgage meltdown is now fully recognized as a serious global credit crunch and with that nearer is drawn the specter of a calamitous downturn.

Will bankruptcy for Fannie and Freddie or bond insurers push things over the edge?

Or perhaps prime borrowers will fail in record numbers as recession sinks in and job losses mount?

No one truly knows for sure but what does seem certain is that 2008 will bring some monumental changes.

New Residential Construction Report: November 2007

Selasa, 18 Desember 2007

Today’s New Residential Construction Report continues to firmly indicate the intensity of the second leg down in the decline to the nation’s housing markets and for new residential construction showing substantial declines on a year-over-year and month-to-month basis to single family permits both nationally and across every region.

Single family housing permits, the most leading of indicators, again suggests extensive weakness in future construction activity dropping 33.7% nationally as compared to November 2006.

Moreover, every region showed significant double digit declines to permits with the West declining 39.6%, the South declining 36.6%, the Midwest declining 20.6% and the Northeast declining 20.9%.

Keep in mind that these declines are coming on the back of last year’s record declines.

To illustrate the extent to which permits and starts have declined, I have created the following charts (click for larger versions) that show the percentage changes of the current values compared to the peak years of 2004 and 2005.

Notice that on each chart the line is essentially combining the year-over-year changes seen in 2005, 2006 and 2007 showing virtually every measure trending down precipitously.

Although year-over-year declines to permits have not accelerated measurably in terms of maximum monthly YOY declines, the fact we are continuing to see declines of roughly 20%-30% on the back of 2006 declines should provide a an unequivocal indication that the housing markets are by no means stabilizing.






Here are the statistics outlined in today’s report:

Housing Permits

Nationally

  • Single family housing permits down 33.7% as compared to November 2006.
Regionally

  • For the Northeast, single family housing down 20.9% as compared to November 2006.
  • For the West, single family housing permits down 39.6% as compared to November 2006.
  • For the Midwest, single family housing permits down 20.6% as compared to November 2006.
  • For the South, single family housing permits down 36.6% compared to October 2006.
Housing Starts

Nationally

  • Single family housing starts down 34.9% as compared to November 2006.
Regionally

  • For the Northeast, single family housing starts down 29.9% as compared to November 2006.
  • For the West, single family housing starts down 38.3% as compared to November 2006.
  • For the Midwest, single family housing starts down 28.6% as compared to November 2006.
  • For the South, single family housing starts down 36.1% as compared to November 2006.
Housing Completions

Nationally

  • Single family housing completions down 28.5% as compared to November 2006.
Regionally

  • For the Northeast, single family housing completions down 32.7% as compared to November 2006.
  • For the West, single family housing completions down 19.2% as compared to November 2006.
  • For the Midwest, single family housing completions down 26.0% as compared to November 2006.
  • For the South, single family housing completions down 32.9% as compared to November 2006.
Keep in mind that this particular report does NOT factor in the cancellations that have been widely reported to be occurring in new construction.

Homebuilder Blues: NAHB/Wells Fargo Home Builder Ratings December 2007

Senin, 17 Desember 2007

Today, the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) released their Housing Market Index (HMI) showing continued evidence that the new home market is experiencing a prolonged recession.

The release came along with a renewed sense of reality and some guarded, yet optimistic, outlook from Chief Economist David Seiders continues to look for an “upswing” in building activity in the second half of 2008.

“Today’s report shows that builders’ views of housing market conditions haven’t changed in the past several months, and there clearly are signs of stabilization in the HMI … At this point, many builders are bracing themselves for the winter months when home buying traditionally slows, scaling down their inventories and repositioning themselves for the time when market conditions can support an upswing in building activity – most likely by the second half of 2008.”

It’s important to understand that each component of the NAHB housing market index is now sitting at OR BELOW the worst levels ever seen in the over 20 years the data has been being compiled.

This suggests that the current severe correction has surpassed all other events seen in the last 22 years and is now firmly in uncharted territory.

Measuring builder confidence across six key data points, the builder survey has been a bellwether for the new home market since 1985.

The component measures used to formulate the overall HMI are respondent ratings on “present conditions”, “future conditions” and “buyer traffic” all of which continue to indicating significant current and future weakness as the new home market slumps its way slowly forward.

The following charts show “present conditions”, “future conditions” and “buyer traffic” both smoothed since 1986 and unadjusted since 2005 (click for larger versions).

Keep in mind that for each measure respondents are asked to assign both a “good” and “poor” rating so in each chart you will notice “good” slumping while “poor” is surging.






Homebuilder Blues: NAHB/Wells Fargo Home Builder Ratings November 2007

Senin, 19 November 2007

Today, the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) released their Housing Market Index (HMI) showing continued evidence that the new home market is experiencing a prolonged recession.

The release came along with a renewed sense of reality and some guarded, yet optimistic, outlook from Chief Economist David Seiders, who has now revised his outlook, pushing his prediction for some level of recovery in the new home market to the second half of 2008.

“The message from today’s report is that builders do not see any significant change in housing market conditions as compared to last month, … While they continue to work down inventories of unsold homes and reposition themselves for the market’s eventual recovery, they realize it will be some time before market conditions support an upswing in building activity – most likely by the second half of 2008.”

It’s important to understand that each component of the NAHB housing market index is now sitting at OR BELOW the worst levels ever seen in the over 20 years the data has been being compiled.

This suggests that the current severe correction has surpassed all other events seen in the last 22 years and is now firmly in uncharted territory.

Measuring builder confidence across six key data points, the builder survey has been a bellwether for the new home market since 1985.

The component measures used to formulate the overall HMI are respondent ratings on “present conditions”, “future conditions” and “buyer traffic” all of which continue to indicating significant current and future weakness as the new home market slumps its way slowly forward.

The following charts show “present conditions”, “future conditions” and “buyer traffic” both smoothed since 1986 and unadjusted since 2005 (click for larger versions).

Keep in mind that for each measure respondents are asked to assign both a “good” and “poor” rating so in each chart you will notice “good” slumping while “poor” is surging.






Constructing Capitulation: June 2007

Senin, 13 Agustus 2007


Looking back at June’s results (released in July) it safe to say that the weakening demand and an ongoing mortgage credit crisis are continuing to weigh heavily on the nation’s housing markets, sending them spiraling down yet another leg in this unprecedented housing decline.

The advance GDP Report for Q2 2007 continued to show a significant drag coming from the decline in residential fixed investment as well as significant revisions to past GDP results better demonstrating the pronounced effects this drag has had for the last four quarters.

The following chart shows real residential and non-residential fixed investment versus overall GDP since Q1 2003 (click for larger version).

The housing weakness also appears to clearly show up in retail sales as consumers pullback on spending for some of the most discretionary of goods.



The National Association of Realtors (NAR) released their fifth consecutive downward revision to their annual home sales forecast for 2007 putting the current outlook far below the “rose colored” initial predictions from the start of the year.

Homebuilder confidence continues to decline to near multi-decade lows with respondents indicating that estimates of “present” and “future” conditions as well as buyer traffic continues to slump.

The Census Department’s New Residential Construction Report which continued to indicate significant weakness in the nation’s housing markets and for residential construction showing substantial declines on a year-over-year basis to single family permits both nationally and across every region.

The Census Department’s New Residential Home Sales Report that, renewed declines, even accelerating in some regions, as well as significant downward revisions to last month’s results.

As with prior months, on a year-over-year basis sales are still declining in the double digits at 22.27% below the sales activity seen in June 2006.

NAR’s Existing Home Sales Report showing additional confirmation that the nation’s housing markets are continuing to experience weakness with EVERY regions showing considerable declines to sales as well as continued increases to inventory and monthly supply.

The May 2007 results of the S&P/Case-Shiller Indices are continued to show weakness for the nation’s housing markets with 15 of the 20 metro areas tracked reporting significant declines.

Topping the list of decliners on a year-over-year basis was Detroit at -11.06%, San Diego at -6.96%, Tampa at -6.67%, Washington DC at -6.34%, Phoenix at -5.55, Boston at -4.29% and Las Vegas at -4.10%.

Furthermore, comparing the last major downturn in the late 80s and early 90s to the current data may indicate that the current housing downturn is in its infancy with year-over-year declines only just having materialized in the last eleven months.


June's Pending Home Sales Report for June 2007 showing a continuation of the historic decline to residential housing on a month-to-month and year-over-year basis, both nationally and in every region.

The Census Department’s Construction Spending Report for June again demonstrated the significant extent to which private residential construction spending is contracting.

With the weakening trend continuing, total residential construction spending fell -16.39% as compared to June 2006 while private single family construction spending declined by a grotesque -25.82%.

Key Report Details:

  • The seasonally adjusted annul rate of private residential construction spending has now dropped 21.80% from the peak set back in February 2006.
  • Overall private residential construction spending dropped -16.39% as compared to June 2006.
  • Single Family residential construction spending dropped 25.82% as compared to June 2006.
The following charts show changes to construction spending (click for larger version):





Reading Rates: MBA Application Survey - June 20 2007

Rabu, 20 Juni 2007

The Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) publishes a weekly applications survey that covers roughly 50 percent of all residential mortgage originations and tracks the average interest rate for 30 year and 15 year fixed rate mortgages as well as application volume for both purchase and refinance applications.

The purchase application index has been highlighted as a particularly important data series as it very broadly captures the demand side of residential real estate for both new and existing home purchases.

The latest data is showing that the average rate for a 30 year fixed rate mortgage has decreased slightly to 6.60% while the purchase volume decreased 3.0% and the refinance volume decreased 4.2% compared to last weeks results.

It’s important to note that the data is reported (and charted) weekly and that the rate data represents average interest rates, and the index data represents mortgage loan application volume for home purchases, home refinances and a composite of all loans.

The following chart shows how the principle and interest cost and estimated annual income required to cover the PITI (using the 29% “rule of thumb”) on a $400,000 loan has changed since January 2007.

The following chart shows the average interest rate for 30 year and 15 year fixed rate mortgages over the last number of weeks (click for larger version).

The following charts show the Purchase Index, Refinance Index and Market Composite Index since January 2007 (click for larger versions).



GDP Report: Q1 2007 Preliminary

Kamis, 31 Mei 2007

Today, the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) released their second installment of the Q1 2007 GDP Report showing truly anemic growth of 0.6% weighed down by, amongst other things, continued weakening to fixed residential investment.

Major praise has to go to Professor Nouriel Roubini for his accurate forecasting having called this deceleration to GDP well in advance as well as virtually nailing the actual figure earlier this month in his post on the “growth recession” while the advance GDP report suggested that growth was closer to 1.3%.

Residential fixed investment, that is, all investment made to construct or improve new and existing residential structures including multi–family units, continued its historic fall-off registering a decline of 15.4% since last quarter while shaving .87% from overall GDP.

Housing continues to be, by far, the most substantial drag on GDP subtracting an amount roughly surpassing to the contributions made by ALL non-durable goods including food, clothing, gasoline, fuel oil.

Keep in mind that the initial GDP reports are highly revised so it seems likely that the coming report (Q1 final) will further capture the historic housing market weakness seen in the first three months of 2007.

The following chart shows real residential and non-residential fixed investment versus overall GDP since Q1 2003 (click for larger version).


GDP Report: Q1 2007 Advance

Jumat, 27 April 2007

Today, the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) released their first installment of the Q1 2007 GDP Report showing truly anemic growth weighed down by continued weakening to fixed residential investment.

Residential fixed investment, that is, all investment made to construct or improve new and existing residential structures including multi–family units, continued its historic fall-off registering a decline of 17.0% since last quarter while shaving .97% from overall GDP resulting in the slowest quarterly growth since Q1 2003.

Additionally, non-residential investment continues at a slower pace registering the second smallest quarterly growth since Q1 2004.

Housing continues to be, by far, the most substantial drag on GDP subtracting an amount roughly equivalent to the contributions made by ALL durable and non-durable goods including food, clothing, gasoline, fuel oil, motor vehicles, furniture, and household equipment, all the way to aircraft during the same period.

Keep in mind that the initial GDP reports are highly revised so it seems likely that the coming reports (Q1 preliminary and Q1 final) will further capture the historic housing market weakness seen in the first three months of 2007.

The following chart shows real residential and non-residential fixed investment versus overall GDP since Q1 2003 (click for larger version).


GDP Report: Q4 2006 Final

Kamis, 29 Maret 2007

Today, the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) released their third and final installment of the Q4 2006 GDP report showing further weakening to fixed residential and non-residential investment.

Residential fixed investment, that is, all investment made to construct or improve new and existing residential structures including multi–family units, continued to accelerate to the downside registering a decline of 19.1% shaving 1.21% from overall GDP.

Additionally, as many had predicted, non-residential investment now appears to be slumping, registering a 3.1% decline for the first time since Q1 2003.

Taken together, fixed investment (both residential and non-residential) depressed GDP by a stunning 1.54%.

To better put the negative effects of the fall-off of fixed investment in perspective, the 1.54% on the downside is roughly equivalent to the 1.53% upward effects from all purchase activity related to all non-durable and durable goods including food, clothing, gasoline, fuel oil, motor vehicles, furniture, all household equipment, all the way to aircraft.

Keep in mind that both Greenspan and Bernanke suggested last fall that the housing decline might depress GDP by roughly 1%.

It appears now that they had significantly underestimated the negative effects of the decline of residential housing as well as totally missing the non-residential slowdown currently brewing.

With the subprime meltdown and its harsh effects on lenders, home builders, home buyers and home owners, the Q1 2007 will likely show even further declines to fixed investment placing even additional downward pressure on GDP.

The following chart shows real residential and non-residential fixed investment versus overall GDP since Q1 2003 (click for larger version).


Do You Feel Lucky?

Selasa, 27 Februari 2007

To say that today is a critical day on Wall Street, and for the whole US economy for that matter, would be a gross understatement.

Today is one of the most critical trading days in decades. Will steady hands prevail or shirk back in order to avoid a falling knife?

Will all the unfettered bullish optimism seen in recent months finally break in the face of some reasonable skepticism about our economy’s outlook?

I guess we will just have to wait until 9:30 AM EST to find out for sure.

But was Tuesday’s sell off really a reaction to an unexpected dip in China's markets or is there a bigger issue?

Could we be experiencing a time in which bullish optimism runs white hot while actual confidence is, in fact, very low?

After all, there have been many recent signals indicating that our economy is not only slowing but may have grown on some fairly shaky ground.

The final Q3 2006 GDP came in well under the expectations, weighed down by a historic decline to residential investment.

The nation's housing market has been in recession for a full year (in some areas even longer) and has shown unprecedented and widespread declines to both home sales and prices, even in the face of unusually low interest rates and a solid job market.

Durable goods orders have been dropping off for several months, further indicating that consumers may be pulling back a bit as a result of loss of real and perceived housing wealth.

The sub-prime melt-down (soon to be the prime-meltdown) is well underway, wreaking havoc across lending institutions of all shapes and sizes providing some substantial evidence that the easy lending heyday of the past will end with a final, sloppy hangover.

The dollar is weak; the yield curve inverted; savings rate negative; our lifestyle is as interest rate sensitive as it has ever been in history.

To top it all off, Greenspan has mentioned the “R” word. Egad!

Tomorrow will no doubt make for great dramatic effect on CNBC and Wall Street as both the New Home Sales report and the second installment of the Q4 2006 GDP report are released.

Only time will tell if we are at a turning-point but given the circumstances, you've got to ask yourself one question: “Do I feel lucky?”

Well, do you, punk?



Copyright © 2007

PaperMoney Blog - www.paperdinero.com
All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer